Supreme Court

SCOTUS to consider three cases that cite the protections afforded by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The Supreme Court ruled that federal courts can’t intervene in cases where political parties blatantly manipulate district maps to their advantage. But there are alternatives to fight partisan gerrymandering.

Fifty two years after the Loving v. Virginia decision, the legalization of interracial marriage has not resulted in a more liberating environment for interracial relationships. To move past legalization and towards liberation, we must decolonize love.

Hernández v. Mesa asks if the border officer who killed Sergio Adrián Hernández Güereca violated his Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights.

A new ruling says that people can be arrested and held indefinitely based on past minor convictions, even if they hold a green card and served their time.

The Supreme Court will not hear a challenge brought by groups that say construction would pose a serious threat.

Native Americans say the North Dakota law was designed to keep them from the polls and violates the Voting Rights Act, the U.S. Constitution and the state Constitution. The Supreme Court just declined to get involved.

“We saw an educated White woman with financial, legal and familial support testify about being sexually assaulted, and then face the emotionally exhausting experience of being cross-examined for hours and disbelieved by many Senators. We got the message: If they won’t listen to her, it will be even worse for us.”

Federal courts halted moves by the Trump administration that would have contaminated water sources and destroyed Native cultural artifacts.