Advocates pledge to continue fighting the discriminatory ban, which denies nationals from several majority Muslim countries from entering the United States.

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the executive orders that sought to block people from several majority Muslim countries from entering the United States.

“Muslim Women’s Day is a call to action.”

It only took President Donald Trump one week in office to turn fear into a policy provision.

“This is how hate gets normalized.”

These seven tweets speak to the youth-driven social media campaign’s goal of celebrating Muslims in all their complexity.

Judge Derrick K. Watson ruled that the ban “plainly discriminates based on nationality.”

The first episode of the new docuseries focuses on Rabyaah Althaibani, a Brooklyn activist whose husband was kept out of the country because of the administration’s efforts to prohibit his entry.

For Nikko Viquiera, air travel once symbolized freedom. But racist and anti-immigrant sentiment has turned flying into a nightmare for this recent immigrant from The Philippines.

Now nationals of eight countries are barred from entering the United States.

“The government does not offer a persuasive explanation for why a mother-in-law is clearly a bona fide relationship, but a grandparent, grandchild, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew or cousin is not.”

The court just ruled that the federal government must extend travel privileges to a larger set of foreign nationals.

The Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump’s ban on nationals of six predominantly-Muslim countries is legal—with some key exceptions. Read on to find out what they are.

The highest court in the land makes an exception for people with “a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.”

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: “Immigration, even for the president, is not a one-person show.”

DOJ spokesperson Sarah Isgur Flores: “The president is not required to admit people from countries that sponsor or shelter terrorism, until he determines that they can be properly vetted and do not pose a security risk to the United States.”

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit rules that the Muslim and refugee ban is less about national security and more about anti-Muslim bias.

The suits demand records from U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Department of Homeland Security.

In response to President Trump toying with the idea of a Muslim registry, Bay Area groups pushed for the ordinance to block city from creating or implementing a a database based on religion, national origin or ethnicity.

They are not the same nations targeted in the failed “Muslim Ban.”