No longer able to defend themselves on Voter ID and Kill at Will legislation they helped popularize -- as much as they tried -- American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is finally dropping both from their agenda, announcing today that they will focus on free market, anti-regulation policies. In a [statement](http://www.alec.org/2012/04/alec-sharpens-focus-on-jobs-free-markets-and...) from Indiana state Rep. David Frizzell, also ALEC's national chairman: > "Today we are redoubling our efforts on the economic front, a priority that has been the hallmark of our organization for decades. Fostering the exchange of pro-growth, solutions-oriented ideas is precisely why ALEC exists. > > "To that end, our legislative board last week unanimously agreed to further our work on policies that will help spur innovation and competitiveness across the country. > > "We are refocusing our commitment to free-market, limited government and pro-growth principles, and have made changes internally to reflect this renewed focus. > "We are eliminating the ALEC Public Safety and Elections task force that dealt with non-economic issues, and reinvesting these resources in the task forces that focus on the economy. The remaining budgetary and economic issues will be reassigned. > > "While we recognize there are other critical, non-economic issues that are vitally important to millions of Americans, we believe we must concentrate on initiatives that spur competitiveness and innovation and put more Americans back to work. > > "Our free-market, limited government, pro-growth policies are the reason ALEC enjoys the support of legislators on both sides of the aisle and in all 50 states. ALEC members are interested in solutions that put the American economy back on track. This is our mission, and it is what distinguishes us." Check for a full explainer from John Nichols over at [The Nation](http://www.thenation.com/blog/167425/alec-disbands-task-force-responsibl...), but a few things here: I wrote earlier this month about [corporations pulling out of ALEC](http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/04/coke_pepsi_and_kraft_have_pulled_...) unofficially in response to the Voter ID and Kill at Will ("Castle Doctrine" or "Stand Your Ground") laws that respectively place barriers to voting rights and led to the death of Trayvon Martin and many others. At the time it was just Kraft, Pepsi and Coke, but since then at least eight other companies involved with ALEC have dropped out. Not all of the companies cited Voter ID or Kill at Will as reasons for their ALEC divorce, but whatever. The fact that ALEC is dropping the killer agendas altogether is an ending I think we can all live with. ALEC didn't go down without a fight. They were defensive until this moment, and just a week ago they called the efforts to have companies part ways with them an "[intimidation campaign](http://www.alec.org/2012/04/alec-responds/)." ALEC executive director Ron Scheberle said: > ALEC is an organization that supports pro-growth, pro-jobs policies and the vigorous exchange of ideas between the public and private sector to develop state based solutions. Today, we find ourselves the focus of a well-funded, expertly coordinated intimidation campaign. > > At a time when job creation, real solutions and improved dialogue among political leaders is needed most, ALEC's mission has never been more important. This is why we are redoubling our commitment to these essential priorities. We are not and will not be defined by ideological special interests who would like to eliminate discourse that leads to economic vitality, jobs and fiscal stability for the states. This was, of course, a cop-out. They seem to be confused about their identity, thinking their role in spreading restrictive voter and loose hand cannon laws don't qualify as "ideological special interests." They must think that only groups like the NAACP and Color of Change, who were at the forefront of getting the divorce papers signed by ALEC member corporations, are special interests because they deal with race. But because ALEC chose to ignore the racial implications of the legislation they were hustling doesn't mean they don't have ideological slants, or that they're not a special interest group. And as I pointed out before, their claim that their real focus is on "economic vitality" is tantamount to Citizen's Councils saying that their real mission is to improve neighborhood real estate values. If it's just about economic decisions then why did ALEC take a gun law crafted in Florida to model and peddle to other states? While ALEC's announcement today is a welcome victory, the bitter part of it is that a lot of damage has already been done. Over half the states in the nation have "Stand Your Ground" laws or some version of it; every state in the nation except Illinois has laws that allow gun owners to carry concealed weapons outside their homes. And as Jill Lepore reported in The New Yorker this week, there are now [as many guns as there are people in the United States](http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/04/23/120423fa_fact_lepore). ALEC is also culpable in the nine states that passed strict photo voter laws, and most of the 21 other states that have other versions of voter ID legislation. The "Public Safety and Elections" task force may be scrapped, but the integrity of that decision would be enhanced if they convinced the state legislators they have such tremendous influence over to reverse course on these deadly laws they helped pass.