(Page 3 of 4)
"If you can have the trial jury public, why not have the grand jury
public?" asks Barron. In the wake of the Sean Bell shooting–where cops
fired 50 rounds at three unarmed men, killing Bell on the night before
his wedding–attorney Norman Siegel and others asked for an independent
prosecutor, afraid that the Queens’ DA was too close to the police. The
DA’s office, in turn, reiterated its independence, and eventually a
grand jury indicted three of the officers involved in the shooting–for
manslaughter, assault and reckless endangerment, though not for
depraved indifference, as some critics had hoped, which could have
drawn a stiffer sentence. No date for the trial has been set.
During the Zongo trial, Judge Straus was especially troubled by
Conroy’s explanation that he was following police protocol by pointing
his gun at the unarmed Zongo. ‘’Is that true? Is that what police are
trained to do?’’ Justice Straus asked, according to
The New York Times. ‘’In the city of New York, how can a police officer be trained to communicate with people by taking a combat stance?"
In response, NYPD officials stated to the press that officers were
explicitly trained not to deal with unarmed civilians by assuming a
combat stance, a policy that is acknowledged by Noel Leader, cofounder
of 100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care and a recently retired NYPD
officer. "We’re taught to keep our finger on the side strap, not the
trigger," explains Leader, who believes that in the Stansbury case,
like Zongo, Officer Neri should have been indicted.
"This was criminal negligence," Leader says. "Neri is in a
residential building that he knows is occupied, and he’s not in pursuit
of a criminal. Yet he’s got his gun out, it’s pointed up and his finger
is on the trigger. If he had even tripped, he would have shot. That is
totally against our training."
But a look at the practice of vertical patrols in public housing
developments reveals that what is taught in theory and what is
practiced on duty don’t always correspond.
In the fall-out from the Stansbury killing, there was a discussion
by Commissioner Kelly and groups like 100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who
Care of revising the procedure for conducting vertical patrols, which
was ultimately shelved. The section of the NYPD Patrol Guide that
covers vertical patrols doesn’t explicitly address whether officers
should have their weapons drawn, stating only that they should conduct
patrols of assigned locations and "take appropriate police action." The
freedom to decide when it is appropriate to draw a weapon is left to
the officer.

The use of this judgment has led some cops to interpret mere human
presence in occupied buildings as a sufficient threat to warrant a
potentially deadly response. Several months after the Stansbury
shooting, Brooklyn firefighters responding to a call of a stuck
elevator in a public housing development in East New York climbed to
the roof to shut off the power. As they walked through the door to the
roof, they were met by two cops on a vertical patrol whose guns were
aimed directly at them. According to the fire department, the cops
explained that they had pointed their guns at them "because they had
heard someone coming up the stairs."
In response, the fire department sent a safety bulletin to every
firehouse in the city, alerting them to "loudly announce that they are
members of the Fire Department" when entering stairwells or the roof
and to remember that "this situation"–of finding NYPD guns suddenly
trained on them–"can occur anytime day or night."